Re: September 2015 Commitfest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Дата
Msg-id 14958.1446431608@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: September 2015 Commitfest  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> writes:
> On 10/31/15 11:19 AM, Nathan Wagner wrote:
>> I think it would be very useful to just be able to tell the system "fire
>> this up for me so I can test it".  I don't think it needs to handle
>> every possible testing scenario, just making it easier to leave up the
>> test postmaster from make check would be very useful, at least to me.

> I've wished that the cluster setup and teardown behavior of pg_regress 
> was available outside of pg_regress itself. Would that mostly suffice 
> for what you're looking for?

I should think not.  pg_regress is not merely not encouraging of outside
connections to the started postmaster; if such is even possible, it's
likely to be regarded as a security bug.  What Nathan is looking for is
arguably useful, but I do not think pg_regress should be expected to
support it.  It needs to be a different tool, with different security
parameters.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patent warning about the Greenplum source code