Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, I think I can fix this. The include of postgres_fe.h was done
> recently:
> revision 1.54
> date: 2003/08/01 13:53:36; author: petere; state: Exp; lines: +4 -2
> Make ecpg SQLSTATE-aware. Map existing SQLCODE assignments to SQLSTATEs,
> rather than parsing the message. Add some documentation about embedded
> SQL.
> It seems like doing postgres_fe.h rather than postgres_ext.h was just an
> oversight, so I will make the change in CVS.
I think you will break things if you do. It's unlikely Peter changed
that on a whim --- ecpg probably now requires more than it did before.
I am not sure that we want to start treating postgres_fe.h as a public
header though --- if we do, that means also c.h and perhaps other stuff.
This needs some thought.
regards, tom lane