Re: [HACKERS] [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar streamfor backup_label

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 17.03.2017, 10:50 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier:
> The comment block format is incorrect. I would think as well that this
> comment should say it is important to have the main tablespace listed
> last it includes the WAL segments, and those need to contain all the
> latest WAL segments for a consistent backup.

How about the attached? The comment now reads as follows:

|Add a node for the base directory. If WAL is included, the base
|directory has to be last as the WAL files get appended to it. If WAL
|is not included, send the base directory first, so that the
|backup_label file is the first file to be sent.

> FWIW, I have no issue with changing the ordering of backups the way
> you are proposing here as long as the comment of this code path is
> clear.

OK, great, let's see what the committers think then.


Michael

-- 
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax:  +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael.banck@credativ.de

credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers