Re: Do we need so many hint bits?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Дата
Msg-id 14867.1353189211@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we need so many hint bits?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: Do we need so many hint bits?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> What's the problem with that? If you already have the VM buffer pinned
> (which should be possible if we keep the VM buffer in a longer-lived
> structure), then doing the test is almost as cheap as checking
> PD_ALL_VISIBLE, because you don't need any locks.

Really?  What about race conditions?  Specifically, I think what you
suggest is likely to be unreliable on machines with weak memory
ordering.  Consider possibility that someone else just changed the VM
bit.  Getting a lock ensures synchronization.  (Yeah, it's possible that
we could use some primitive cheaper than a lock ... but it's not going
to be free.)
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL