Re: Proposal: TABLE functions

"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com> writes:
>> I thought you said this was just syntactic sugar for capabilities we
>> already had?

> My mistake. I am sorry. I have to store somewhere flag. One bit, which 
> signalise "don't use OUT arguments as function's parameters".

Huh?  What exactly is the meaning of the arguments then?

It sounds to me like this might be better thought of as a new
proargmode value, but I'm quite unsure what you're talking about ...
        regards, tom lane