Re: The enormous s->childXids problem

Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> The real question is why does the subtransaction actually assign itself
>> an XID --- a simple RETURN NEXT operation ought not do that, AFAICS.

> I suspect the answer to that is the same as the answer to what's actually
> creating the subtransaction. plperl_return_next doesn't. I think something
> must be doing an actual SPI query, not just a return next.

The other question on the table is why it didn't respond to QueryCancel
in a reasonable amount of time.  I'd really like to see a complete test
case for this problem ...
        regards, tom lane