Re: pg_am access in simple transaction?
| От | pinker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_am access in simple transaction? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1480086286184-5931991.post@n3.nabble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_am access in simple transaction? (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_am access in simple transaction?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver-4 wrote
> I can not replicate using 50 clients instead of 2000. I suspect either
> has to do with the extreme number of clients or it is an artifact of
> from some other process.
And I have replicated it with 50 clients as well... lsof output:
51 data/base/13328/2601
command: watch 'lsof -e /run/user/1001/gvfs +D data|awk "{print
\$NF}"|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr'
Maybe our versions of PostgreSQL differs? I use "PostgreSQL 9.5.4 on
x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 6.1.1 20160621 (Red Hat
6.1.1-3), 64-bit"
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/pg-am-access-in-simple-transaction-tp5931974p5931991.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: