Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:04:44AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> There seem to be no good answers here.

> There is one fairly good answer:

> Use a perl that's compiled to support multiplicity but not threads.
> That avoids the sort bug and, as an extra bonus, gives plperl a
> significant speed boost.

[ scratches head... ] Why would threading have anything to do with the
security behavior imposed by Safe?

            regards, tom lane