Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Ugh, no it isn't: even pretty recent clang releases only define
>> __GNUC__ as 4. It looks like we need a separate test on clang's
>> version. I looked at their version history and sanitizers seem
>> to have come in around clang 7, so I propose the attached (where
>> I worked a bit harder on the comment, too).
> Looks good to me. Thank you for revising!
Were you going to push this, or did you expect me to?
regards, tom lane