Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1477791.1675320029@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> Regarding the concern about a pre-receive hook blocking an emergency push, the
> hook could approve every push where a string like "pgindent: no" appears in a
> commit message within the push. You'd still want to make the tree clean
> sometime the same week or so. It's cheap to provide a break-glass like that.
I think the real question here is whether we can get all (or at least
a solid majority of) committers to accept such draconian constraints.
I'd buy into it, and evidently so would you, but I can't help noting
that less than a quarter of active committers have bothered to
comment on this thread. I suspect the other three-quarters would
be quite annoyed if we tried to institute such requirements. That's
not manpower we can afford to drive away.
Maybe this should get taken up at the this-time-for-sure developer
meeting at PGCon?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: