Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14696.1125675741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Locale implementation questions (was: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch)
Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> I still doesn't get where the hostility towards this functionality comes from.
We're not really willing to say "here is a piece of syntax REQUIRED
BY THE SQL SPEC which we only support on some platforms". readline,
O_DIRECT, and the like are a completely inappropriate analogy, because
those are inherently platform-dependent (and not in the spec).
The objection is fundamentally that a platform-specific implementation
cannot be our long-term goal, and so expending effort on creating one
seems like a diversion. If there were a plan put forward showing how
this is just a useful way-station, and we could see how we'd later get
rid of the glibc dependency without throwing away the work already done,
then it would be a different story.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: