Re: BUG #5275: validate_exec in port/exec.c only reads u/g/o, not ACLs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #5275: validate_exec in port/exec.c only reads u/g/o, not ACLs
Дата
Msg-id 14691.1263444023@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #5275: validate_exec in port/exec.c only reads u/g/o, not ACLs  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But we force those to be the same in main.c.  Anyway there are several
>> other uses of access() in the code ...

> Yea, I am not saying the text is right, but rather why it was not
> considered for use in that case.

Actually, since that code has been untouched since Berkeley days,
my bet is that we just never considered changing it at all.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #5275: validate_exec in port/exec.c only reads u/g/o, not ACLs
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Termination When Switching between PL/Perl and PL/PerlU