Re: pg_stat_ssl additions

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:31:59PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Any thoughts from others about whether to rename clientdn to client_dn
>> to allow better naming of the new fields?

> Makes sense.  The SSL acronyms can get very complex.

+1.  It seems unlikely to me that there are very many applications out
there that have references to this view, so we can probably get away
with rationalizing the field names.

            regards, tom lane