Re: [HACKERS] Improving RLS planning

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.  Attached is an updated patch that I believe
>> addresses all of the review comments so far.  The code is unchanged from
>> v2, but I improved the README, some comments, and the regression tests.

> I've reviewed your updates and they answer all of my comments and I
> appreciate the EC regression tests you added.

> I also agree with Dean's down-thread suggested regression test change.

Thanks for reviewing --- I'll do something with that test case and
push it.
        regards, tom lane