Re: HOT is applied
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HOT is applied |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14662.1190399345@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HOT is applied ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > We've already checked that the xmin is our own transaction id, so we > check if the xmax is an aborted subtransaction of our own transaction. A > TransactionIdDidAbort call seems like an awfully expensive way to check > that. We could call TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId instead, which > doesn't need to access any shared memory structures (but might be > expensive if you have a lot of active subxacts, as you pointed out). Applied --- seems to buy another 50% savings in the example with all the pruning activity. I'll get after the pruning activity itself in a bit, but it seems worth squeezing the tqual functions first while we have this example that stresses them so much. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: