Re: HOT is applied

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: HOT is applied
Дата
Msg-id 14662.1190399345@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: HOT is applied  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> We've already checked that the xmin is our own transaction id, so we
> check if the xmax is an aborted subtransaction of our own transaction. A
> TransactionIdDidAbort call seems like an awfully expensive way to check
> that. We could call TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId instead, which
> doesn't need to access any shared memory structures (but might be
> expensive if you have a lot of active subxacts, as you pointed out).

Applied --- seems to buy another 50% savings in the example with all the
pruning activity.  I'll get after the pruning activity itself in a bit,
but it seems worth squeezing the tqual functions first while we have
this example that stresses them so much.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pavan Deolasee"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HOT is applied
Следующее
От: "Brendan Jurd"
Дата:
Сообщение: Text <-> C string