Re: HOT is applied
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HOT is applied |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14662.1190399345@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: HOT is applied ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> We've already checked that the xmin is our own transaction id, so we
> check if the xmax is an aborted subtransaction of our own transaction. A
> TransactionIdDidAbort call seems like an awfully expensive way to check
> that. We could call TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId instead, which
> doesn't need to access any shared memory structures (but might be
> expensive if you have a lot of active subxacts, as you pointed out).
Applied --- seems to buy another 50% savings in the example with all the
pruning activity. I'll get after the pruning activity itself in a bit,
but it seems worth squeezing the tqual functions first while we have
this example that stresses them so much.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: