Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Дата
Msg-id 14658.984683064@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
Ответы Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> ... I would either
> use fsync as default or don't deal with O_SYNC at all.
> But if O_DSYNC is defined and O_DSYNC != O_SYNC then we should
> use O_DSYNC by default.

Hm.  We could do that reasonably painlessly as a compile-time test in
xlog.c, but I'm not clear on how it would play out as a GUC option.
Peter, what do you think about configuration-dependent defaults for
GUC variables?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Следующее
От: Alfred Perlstein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC