Re: broken doc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: broken doc
Дата
Msg-id 14619.1188533172@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: broken doc  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote
>> Can someone please fix this?

> It's working for me

On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those
two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says.

I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of bookindex.sgml
entries makes me think that those index entries have a semantic conflict
with these entries over in indices.sgml:
  <indexterm>   <primary>GiST</primary>   <see>index</see>  </indexterm>
  <indexterm>   <primary>GIN</primary>   <see>index</see>  </indexterm>

Perhaps we need to have a meeting of the minds on who gets to define the
primary index entries about GiST and GIN?

Peter will probably have a clearer idea about how to fix this ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: broken doc
Следующее
От: Yoshiyuki Asaba
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failed on Windows 2000