Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I just did CHECKPOINT;CHECKPOINT and got the warning in the logs. This
> needs to be fixed.
See code:
/*
* Ideally we should only warn if this checkpoint was
* requested due to running out of segment files, and not
* if it was manually requested. However we can't tell the
* difference with the current signalling mechanism.
*/
I could argue that a client-driven process that issues CHECKPOINT every
few seconds is equally deserving of a warning. The only thing wrong is
that the HINT is inapplicable ... but that's why it's a HINT and not
part of the main message.
regards, tom lane