Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> While hacking on parser/gram.y just now I noticed in passing that the
> automatically generated ecpg parser had 402 shift/reduce conflicts.
> (Don't panic, the parser in CVS is fine.) If you don't pay very close
> attention, it is easy to miss this. Considering also that we frequently
> have to educate contributors that parser conflicts are not acceptable,
> should we try to error out if we see conflicts?
Would "%expect 0" produce the same result in a less klugy way?
regards, tom lane