Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14562.1546986683@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) (John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Just a couple comments about the module:
> -If you qualify the function's module name as you did
> (PerfectHash::generate_hash_function), you don't have to export the
> function into the callers namespace, so you can skip the @EXPORT_OK
> setting. Most of our modules don't export.
OK by me. I was more concerned about hiding the stuff that isn't
supposed to be exported.
> -There is a bit of a cognitive clash between $case_sensitive in
> gen_keywordlist.pl and $case_insensitive in PerfectHash.pm. They each
> make sense in their own file, but might it be worth using one or the
> other?
Yeah, dunno. It seems to make sense for the command-line-level default of
gen_keywordlist.pl to be "case insensitive", since most users want that.
But that surely shouldn't be the default in PerfectHash.pm, and I'm not
very sure how to reconcile the discrepancy.
> In the committed keyword patch, I noticed that in common/keywords.c,
> the array length is defined with
> ScanKeywordCategories[SCANKEYWORDS_NUM_KEYWORDS]
> but other keyword arrays just have ...[]. Is there a reason for the difference?
The length macro was readily available there so I used it. AFAIR
that wasn't true elsewhere, though I might've missed something.
It's pretty much just belt-and-suspenders coding anyway, since all
those arrays are machine generated ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: