Hi,
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 07:43 -0500, John Harvey wrote:
<snip>
> In short, it says that the team does not want to use postgresql's version
> number in the artifacts. This would explain why the current releases of
> pgjdbc are not prefixed with 9.5, and are still at 9.4. It is my guess
> that the numbering of pgjdbc will stay on 9.4 for some time. But, I think
> this is sufficient evidence that having a hard dependency on a postgres
> major version is something that is not needed. So, I think I agree with
> your assessment. If you wanted a second opinion, Dave Cramer might be the
> best person to comment.
Ok, I removed all the version dependent macros from spec file. Thanks for the
comment.
> Additionally, I can verify that the if-block's make sense in the combined
> spec-file. I tried one of your pre-release specfiles on EL6 and had issues
> with "add_maven_depmap", "%files -f .mfiles", and the 2 "_javadir" files.
> I think the if-blocks are clean, and I approve your new changes with regard
> to making a combined specfile.
Thanks for confirming this.
I pushed packages for 9.1+ on EL 6 - 7 and Fedora 22-23.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR