Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY!
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14524.1289588633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY! (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY!
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> With how similar straight C and en_US.UTF8 are it was suggested to me,
>> by persons who are far more C knowledgeable then I in my office, that
>> this is something the PG community could "fix" . A "fix" being so that
>> "col LIKE 'foo%' " could use btree indexes in locales like en_US.UTF8
>> (and probably some others).
>> is the request unreasonable ? anyone got any idea of the price tag to
>> make that happen ?
> I thought it already did that.
No, and the odds of it ever happening are insignificant. The sort order
associated with en_US (and other "dictionary order" locales) is just too
randomly different from what you need to optimize a LIKE search.
(Whoever told you en_US sorts similarly to C is nuts.)
The solution if you want the database's prevailing sort order to be en_US
is to put an extra text_pattern_ops index on the column you want to do
LIKE searches on. We might eventually have the ability to spell that
"put a C-locale index on the column", but text_pattern_ops is the way to
do it today.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: