Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Дата
Msg-id 1452.1207058761@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> Was the driver ever changed to take advantage of the above strategy?

Well, it's automatic as long as you use the unnamed statement.  About
all that might need to be done on the client side is to use unnamed
statements more often in preference to named ones, and I believe that
something like that did get done in JDBC.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Следующее
От: Michael Paesold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work