Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1451.1511727581@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Mumble. It's a property I'm pretty hesitant to give up, especially
>> since the stats views have worked like that since day one. It's
>> inevitable that weakening that guarantee would break peoples' queries,
>> probably subtly.
> You mean, queries against the stats views, or queries in general? If
> the latter, by what mechanism would the breakage happen?
Queries against the stats views, of course.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: