Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers
Дата
Msg-id 14507.1143261580@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Query plans for plpgsql triggers  ("Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com>)
Ответы Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers  ("Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com>)
Список pgsql-general
"Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com> writes:
> When is the UPDATE statement inside foo() planned?  When the trigger
> is first created, or when it's first used per backend, or every time
> it's used per backend?

First use per backend, ignoring corner cases such as replacing the
function definition.

> I dunno what plan is being generated, but it's gotta be using a
> sequential scan.

The issue is probably that the planner is seeing a parameterized
query.  Try this:

prepare foo(int8) as update some_other_table SET field = 'value' WHERE id = $1;
explain execute foo(42);

and see what plan you get.  If the id field has sufficiently
discouraging statistics then the planner may think that a seqscan
is the safest plan.  In a "normal" query where you're comparing id
to a constant, the planner can see whether the constant matches any
of the most common values for the column --- if it doesn't then an
indexscan is a good plan.

If you really want a replan every time, you can get it by using
EXECUTE.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Eric B. Ridge"
Дата:
Сообщение: Query plans for plpgsql triggers
Следующее
От: "Eric B. Ridge"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers