Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14454.1501969053@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review (Jonathan Katz <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review
Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jonathan Katz <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> writes:
> I see this one
> > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a multixact with exactly one
still-interestingmember
> But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted.
I'm not sure about that either. I do not think anyone did the legwork
to determine the exact consequences of that bug, or the probability of
someone hitting it in the field. But I think the latter must be really
low, because we haven't heard any field reports that seem to match up.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: