Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> PQping is supposed to be smarter about classifying errors
>> than this.
> I was not aware this was discussed last week because I am behind on
> email. I was fixing a report from a month ago. I did explain how I was
> doing the tests.
Um, you did respond in that thread, several times even:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01102.php
so I kind of assumed that the patch you presented this week did
what was agreed to last week.
I have committed a patch to make PQping do what was agreed to.
regards, tom lane