Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> There was some discussion of doing this in general for all inserts
> inside the indexam. The btree indexam could buffer up any inserts done
> within the transaction and keep them in an in-memory btree. Any
> lookups done within the transaction first look up in the in-memory
> tree then the disk. If the in-memory buffer fills up then we flush
> them to the index.
> The reason this is tempting is that we could then insert them all in a
> single index-merge operation which would often be more efficient than
> retail inserts.
That's not gonna work for a unique index, which unfortunately is a
pretty common case ...
regards, tom lane