Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze
Дата
Msg-id 14301.1115840296@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet <guillaume_ml@smet.org>)
Ответы Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze
Список pgsql-performance
Guillaume Smet <guillaume_ml@smet.org> writes:
>> If so, can we see the pg_stats rows for the object_id and
>> parent_application_id columns?

> See attached file.

Well, those stats certainly appear to justify the planner's belief that
the indexscan needn't run very far: the one value of
parent_application_id is 1031 and this is below the smallest value of
object_id seen by analyze.  You might have better luck if you increase
the statistics target for acs_objects.object_id.  (It'd be interesting
to know what fraction of acs_objects actually does have object_id < 1032.)

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Guillaume Smet
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze
Следующее
От: Guillaume Smet
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze