Re: WAL Bypass for indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Дата
Msg-id 14242.1144078893@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL Bypass for indexes  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 2006-04-03 kell 09:55, kirjutas Tom Lane:
>> (2) Some of the index code is itself deliberately nondeterministic.
>> I'm thinking in particular of the move-right-or-not choice in
>> _bt_insertonpg() when there are many equal keys, but randomization is
>> in general a useful algorithmic technique that we'd have to forswear.

> Why can't we just order "many equal keys" by ctid ?

Why is that better?  The bit of code mentioned above certainly isn't
going to benefit --- it will lose the opportunity to try to avoid a page
split.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: semaphore usage "port based"?