Re: scanner/parser minimization

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: scanner/parser minimization
Дата
Msg-id 14204.1362236984@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: scanner/parser minimization  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: scanner/parser minimization  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> Regarding yytransition I think the problem is we're using flex to
> implement keyword recognition which is usually not what it's used for.
> Usually people use flex to handle syntax things like quoting and
> numeric formats. All identifiers are handled by flex as equivalent.
> Then the last step in the scanner for identifiers is to look up the
> identifier in a hash table and return the keyword token if it's a
> keyword. That would massively simplify the scanner tables.

Uh ... no.  I haven't looked into why the flex tables are so large,
but this theory is just wrong.  See ScanKeywordLookup().
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: scanner/parser minimization
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: scanner/parser minimization