Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql
Дата
Msg-id 1420.1397099637@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> That's what I thought too, but I see a schema file in pg_extensions:

Read the manual.

> Should we hard-code a pg_catalog plpgsql to be skipped in pg_dump?

No, I don't think so.

The real issue here is that we don't have a notion of a "built-in
extension".  I think this was specifically debated back when we
extension-ified plpgsql, though I don't recall details of why
we ended up not doing that.  Maybe the idea was that you could
drop and then re-add plpgsql?  Anyway, I think this is not such
a simple issue and a one-line hack in pg_dump is not likely to
improve matters.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: log_checkpoints, microseconds