Re: pg_locks needs a facelift

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
Дата
Msg-id 14187.1115178221@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_locks needs a facelift  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Ответы Re: pg_locks needs a facelift  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:08AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> 1998 when the oid played a larger role, it is now quite rightly
>> deprecated and my intention is to remove it from the userlock module.

> I wish you wouldn't since http://rrs.decibel.org uses it.

Don't worry, I'll veto any immediate removal of functionality ;-)

The correct way to handle this is to add some better userlock
functionality and deprecate what's there.  We can remove the crufty
stuff in a release or three after it's been officially deprecated
... but there is no reason to remove it immediately.  It won't conflict
with a better version, just exist alongside.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement