Re: proposal: CREATE DATABASE vs. (partial) CHECKPOINT
| От | David G Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: proposal: CREATE DATABASE vs. (partial) CHECKPOINT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1414456421505-5824522.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: proposal: CREATE DATABASE vs. (partial) CHECKPOINT ("Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote > I mean, when we use database A as a template, why do we need to checkpoint > B, C, D and F too? (Apologies if this is somehow obvious, I'm way out of > my comfort zone in this part of the code.) IIUC you have to checkpoint the whole cluster because it is not possible to do checkpoint individual databases. There is only a single WAL stream and while it could have source database markers I don't believe it does so there is no way to have separate checkpoint locations recorded for different databases. Adding such seems to introduce a lot of book-keeping and both reload and file size overhead for little practical gain. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/proposal-CREATE-DATABASE-vs-partial-CHECKPOINT-tp5824343p5824522.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: