Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [citation needed]? Exactly what characters are missing, and why would
>> the Unicode people have chosen to leave them out? It's not like they've
>> not heard of those encodings, I'm sure.
> Here is an interesting description of some of the gotchas:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252
Well, it's interesting, but I see no glyphs on that page that lack
Unicode assignments.
regards, tom lane