Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14090.1237943924@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others
> definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already
> handling a *lot* of traffic for.
It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what
questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this
is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic
about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces
without much loss IMHO.
The other global lists seem to be in good health from what I can see.
Can't speak to the regional or user-group lists, I don't follow them.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: