Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14068.1271688932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData()
during Hot Standby by avoiding loop
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:44 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> Choices are
>>> 1. Check RecoveryInProgress() once outside of lock, plus wild rumour of
>>> Murphy
>>> 2. Check RecoveryInProgress() before and after holding lock
>>> 3. Check RecoveryInProgress() while holding lock
>>
>> 4. Check RecoveryInProgress() once outside of lock, and scan the
>> ProcArray anyway, just in case. That's what we did before this patch.
>> Document that takenDuringRecovery == true means that the snapshot was
>> most likely taken during recovery, but there is some race conditions
>> where takenDuringRecovery is true even though the snapshot was taken
>> just after recovery finished. AFAICS all of the other current uses of
>> takenDuringRecovery work fine with that.
> Checking RecoveryInProgress() is much cheaper than scanning the whole
> ProcArray, so (4) is definitely worse than 1-3.
If the lock we're talking about is an LWLock, #3 is okay. If it's a
spinlock, not so much.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: