Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Loberant
Тема Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Дата
Msg-id 1406749447911-5813345.post@n5.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Was this issue ever resolved?
We are now having Nagios checks failing due to the pg_size_pretty function,
and the check runs fine on my local machine 9.1 (fails on 9.2 and 9.3, both
having two pg_size_pretty functions).

Thanks,
Josh



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/No-pg-size-pretty-numeric-was-not-such-a-hot-idea-tp5710106p5813345.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New developer TODO suggestions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea