Re: parametric block size?
| От | Thomas Kellerer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: parametric block size? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1406564615879-5813060.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: parametric block size? (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Possibly stopping at the tablespace level might be more straightforward.
> To avoid messing up the pages in shared buffers we'd perhaps need
> something like several shared buffer pools - each with either its own
> blocksize or associated with a (set of) tablespace(s).
This is exactly how Oracle does it. You can specify the blocksize when
creating a tablespace.
For each blocksize a separate buffer cache ("shared buffers" in Postgres
terms) can be configured. So the cache is not maintained on tablespace level
but on blocksize level.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/parametric-block-size-tp5812350p5813060.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: