Re: undead index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: undead index
Дата
Msg-id 14012.1304700242@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: undead index  (Jens Wilke <jens.wilke@affinitas.de>)
Список pgsql-general
Jens Wilke <jens.wilke@affinitas.de> writes:
> On Friday 06 May 2011 18:08:58 Tom Lane wrote:
>> There doesn't appear to be any fix for this that doesn't require a time
>> machine and/or a lot more effort than it's worth.

> Isn't it possible to backport the fix for pg_get_indexdef() to 8.* ?

We could install a kluge (not backport the actual change, which was
adding CONCURRENTLY to the set of grammar keywords).  But that would
only help people who were trying to update from 8.4.something-after-8.

Now that I think about it, I believe we considered that at the time,
and rejected it on the grounds that the case would come up so seldom as
to not be worth the trouble.  I think that's probably still true, and
anyway the value of doing it drops further every day.  The time to have
done it would have been a year ago.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jens Wilke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: undead index
Следующее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Growing a live database