Re: pg_dump vs malloc
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump vs malloc |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1401.1308757736@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump vs malloc (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump vs malloc
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Something along the line of this?
I think this is a seriously, seriously bad idea:
> +#define strdup(x) pg_strdup(x)
> +#define malloc(x) pg_malloc(x)
> +#define calloc(x,y) pg_calloc(x, y)
> +#define realloc(x,y) pg_realloc(x, y)
as it will render the code unreadable to people expecting the normal
behavior of these fundamental functions; not to mention break any
call sites that have some other means of dealing with an alloc failure
besides going belly-up. Please take the trouble to do
s/malloc/pg_malloc/g and so on, instead.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: