Re: Speaking of pgstats

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Speaking of pgstats
Дата
Msg-id 14008.1144290160@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Speaking of pgstats  (Agent M <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Agent M <agentm@themactionfaction.com> writes:
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but using UDP logging on the same 
> computer is a red herring. Any non-blocking I/O would do, no? If the 
> buffer is full, then the non-blocking I/O send function will fail and 
> the message is skipped.

Uh, not entirely.  We'd like the thing to drop complete messages, not
inject partial messages into the channel causing reader parsing errors.
This is one reason for liking UDP semantics better than pipe semantics.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Philip Yarra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql \c error
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Summer of Code Preparation