On 2020-09-04 21:45, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:21 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us
> <mailto:bruce@momjian.us>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:26:53AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> > Whether to actually change the behavior of to_date is up for
> debate though I
> > would presume it would not be back-patched.
>
> OK, so, looking at this thread, we have to_date() treating -1 as -2 BC,
> make_date() treating -1 as 1 BC, and we have Oracle, which to_date() is
> supposed to match, making -1 as 1 BC.
>
> Because we already have the to_date/make_date inconsistency, and the -1
> to -2 BC mapping is confusing, and doesn't match Oracle, I think the
> clean solution is to change PG 14 to treat -1 as 1 BC, and document the
> incompatibility in the release notes.
>
>
> I agree that someone else should write another patch to fix the behavior
> for v14. Still suggest committing the proposed patch to master and all
> supported versions to document the existing behavior correctly. The fix
> patch can work from that.
Adding support for negative years in make_timestamp seems pretty
straightforward; see attached patch.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services