Hello, Bernd.
You wrote:
BH> --On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
BH> wrote:
>> Enum. If we do this then it seems entirely fair that someone might
>> want other settings someday. Also, it seems silly to pick a format
>> partly on the grounds that it's expansible, and then not make the
>> control GUC expansible. Perhaps
>>
>> SET bytea_output = [ hex | traditional ]
BH> I like the enum much better, too, but
BH> SET bytea_output = [ hex | escape ]
BH> looks better to me (encode/decode are using something like this already).
BH> --
BH> Thanks
BH> Bernd
Yeah, this looks nice for me too
--
With best wishes,Pavel mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com