Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks. This looks pretty good to me after a skim, so I'll see about
> committing/back-patching it in the near future. IIUC there is likely more
> to come in this area, but I see no need to wait.
Uh ... what of this would we back-patch? It seems like v18
material to me.
regards, tom lane