Thank you Greg for the response.=0A=A0=0AOur management wants to know wheth=
er the bugs 8382 & 3231 & 7760=A0are fixed in 9.0.15 before we decide to up=
grade from 9.0.4 version to 9.0.15.=0A=A0=0AIt would be helpful to convienc=
e our customers who has reported the issue.=0A=A0=0AThank you,=0AUmesh=0A=
=0A=0A=0AOn Saturday, 21 December 2013 6:42 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> =
wrote:=0A =0AOn Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Umesh Kirdat <umesh.kirdat@=
yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0A> The Postgres version on which the issue was report=
ed is 8.2.2=0A> We have upgraded our Postgres version to 9.0.4 in the curre=
nt product=0A> release and I would like to know whether the issue in discus=
sion is fixed in=0A> Postgres 9.0.4?=0A=0A=0AWhen there's any sort of, than=
kfully rare, corruption bug the symptom=0Awhich people first notice is ofte=
n duplicate primary keys. So your=0Aquestion is really whether 9.0.4 is fre=
e of any (known) corruption=0Abugs.=0A=0AFor what it's worth the current re=
lease for the=0A 9.0 major version is=0A9.0 is 9.0.15. There are over 2 1/2=
years of bug fixes between 9.0.4=0Aand 9.0.15 including some corruption bu=
gs which could possibly=0Aintroduce duplicate rows. Also including one majo=
r security fix for=0ACVE-2013-1899.=0A=0A=0A=0A-- =0Agreg