Re: Extension Templates S03E11
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1386178512.19125.254.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 09:50 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I still don't see that Extension Templates are all bad: > > * They preserve the fact that two instances of the same extension > > (e.g. in different databases) were created from the same template. > > This is only true if we change the extension templates to be shared > catalogs, which they aren't today.. I agree with you about that -- I don't like per-DB templates. I guess the challenge is that we might want to use namespaces to support user-installable extensions, and namespaces reside within a DB. But I think we can find some other solution there (e.g. user names rather than schemas), and per-DB templates are just not a good solution anyway. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: