On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 01:37 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Back in December, when I agreed that "upload zip file via libpq" might
> be useful, Tom suggested that we call control+sql file a "template", and
> the installed entity an "extension".
Simply uploading "safe" extension files (i.e. not native libraries)
using the protocol seems narrower in scope and less controversial.
However, I like the idea of putting extensions in the catalogs (aside
from DSOs of course), too. Setting aside compatibility problems with
existing extensions, do you think that's a reasonable goal to work
toward, or do you think that's a dead end?
Regards,Jeff Davis