Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Дата
Msg-id 1385153125.34312.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> That looks sane for pg_dump, but I would rather have expected
> that pg_dumpall would need to emit the same thing (possibly more
> than once due to reconnections).

I was kinda surprised myself.  I changed it for pg_dump, tested
that, and then tested pg_dumpall to get a baseline, and the setting
was taken care of.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Building on S390