Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This code should probably be using namecpy(). Note namecpy()
> doesn't memset() after strncpy() and has survived the test of
> time, which strongly suggests that the memset is indeed
> superfluous.
That argument would be more persuasive if I could find any current
usage of the namecpy() function anywhere in the source code.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company